It is understood that the source of this initiative that Swinburne sees as insane. “What do we do, let’s get rid of the result of God?” By saying, instead of finding the truth, the aim of the escape, the avoidance has called so many fantasy claims. It was a product of the desire to derive the universities of the universal (Oscillating Universe) allegation that we have seen that we were examined and scientifically not possible. As cafer was loyal as they said, even if they were such universes, it could not shade the design evidence: “When the unknown unknown is made in a logical inference, it is the main characteristics of the project to be directed. If the only universe known as in the example is very tidy and the unknown is the only tip of the unknown, if the normal reasoning must take the fact that the unknown universals can be regular as well as the least known as the unknown universities may be as regular. As a result, the discovery of our known universe’s initial conditions and extraordinary cosmic matches in the basic constants are seen to be shadowed to a great strength and richness to the sampled floor of the design evidence of God in the recent years, the identity of the design evidence of God, is very universes scenarios and their comments. “
In which situations of the Ockhamli’s razor, we have seen how to use the endless universe scenarios of the endless universe scenarios from the Ockhamli’s razor. It will be useful to read that title on this subject.
To avoid the results of the “humanistic principle”, I would like to explain the infinite universes scenario with an example of what you are doing what is made up of the scenario: think you are in a casino with thousands of roulette table. I tell you that all roulette games are fraudulent and say the result of a hundred thousands of games on thousands of table as evidence. When the results I gave is correctly, the result of roulette games is known to be known as the result of the time, and you are telling someone about this event. The person you tell is that it can be accidentally, if all people go to casinos are such an estimate, it says one is the possibility of fastening. Then, when you show that it is impossible for the possibility, it may be infinite planets that may be infinite planets, it may be infinite people in this endless planets, it is likely that one of them is likely to capture such a result with a random estimate, as it is likely to capture such a result in a random estimate, you are my liar that the roulette games are known in advance. What happens if my answer tells me that I’m successfully accomplished? Say you believe in the presence of infinite casinos, do you still get up to explain the conclusion of hundreds of thousands of roulette games on the roulette table?
We are a single universe eye. Big Bang Theory revealed that this universe is a finite structure with its expanding limits. The critical values in this single universe also reveals that the universe is designed by a superior manner. If we didn’t even agree to a scenario, such as endless universes, this conclusion would not change. But as there is no rational reason that requires accepting this scenario, this scenario is seen as a fantasy away from the mind.